当前在线人数14876
首页 - 分类讨论区 - 校友联谊 - 上海交通大学版 -文摘区 - 阅读文章
未名交友
[更多]
[更多]
文章阅读:discussion by XJTU alumni
[版面: 上海交通大学] [作者:mechania] , 1998年12月29日20:58:49
mechania
进入未名形象秀
我的博客
[上篇] [下篇]

发信人: mechania (sweet), 信区: SJTU
标  题: discussion   by XJTU alumni
发信站: The unknown SPACE (Tue Dec 29 20:58:59 1998), 转信

discussion


                [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ 交通大学国际论坛 ]


Posted by XJTU alumni on December 28, 1998 at 12:38:59:

In Reply to: 回顾交通大学百年沧桑(5)--正宗争论篇 posted by
sanford on December 28,
1998 at 09:07:36:

I insisted in my last posting, both sides need to bring in more detailed
information about JTU history, especially from 56-59, before this very
sensitive topic opened. I think everybody is ready to face
any fact that those information may indicates, because facts and hard
numbers speak louder than personal opinions.

However, sandford think himself as being qualified to write and judge
this sensitive issue, I was so disappointed about this.

This article reflects a lot of personal opinions and implications which
is not based on facts.

朱开轩于是“动感情”地说如果没有西交我对不起当初去大西北的交大教师。其实
朱也另藏一番心,主要是想尽量扩大重中之重范围,把自已的母校天津大学以及南
开大学也拉进来
How do you know this? What zhu said is fair and is with solid ground. where
is your implication come from?

从双方主观上比较,西安交大对西迁历史耿耿于怀,总
是爱扭着上交不放,争论谁是正宗继承人,有时甚至
贬低对方以抬高自己。上海交大则从来不愿提西迁历史,
甚至直称自己为交通大学,在高校比较中,往往愿意
与复旦、清华以及浙大比,淡化与西交的竞争,再加上海
人比较实际,也懒得老在历史问题纠缠。

The above section is so biased, totally make judgement from SJTU point of
view. Why china ask for apology from japan about historical issues?
According to your logic, world war II ended 50 years ago, is it necessary
to revisit it? SJTU never show any respect to XJTU, seldom mark the
relocation incident in its so-called JTU history and titled itself as JTU
everywhere, If you were put in XJTU's postion, what is your feedback?

The reason why XJTU keeps sending warning to SJTU about JTU history and
real JTU title is because SJTU always intentionally neglects some important
historic facts. As you wrote down here,

1. 对西迁历史很少也不愿意再提起,
2. 上海交大则从来不愿提西迁历史,甚至直称自己为交通大学

I initially hope, so much, sandford as SJTU alumni, will not follow the
same attitude as SJTU official opinion to intentionally fade or neglect
JTU hisory. What I want is just a full discussion about relocation incident
before the sensitive topic jump on to the table. However, what disappointed
me is your skip of the full discussion, and have something conclusive or
'implicitly conclusive'.

我个人认为,两所交大分家已经是历史事实。今后双方
应采取向前看的态度,不必老在历史问题上争来争去。

It is definitely right, we should face the competition hand by hand, like
brothers. However, what is also crutial is the proper settlement about
history, intentionlly fade or neglect some facts will never solve the
problem, it can only make it worse, jappanese always say: 'past is past,
let us face the future' Neglectance of the past or self-entitled JTU makes
SJTU easily invade the 'live space' of XJTU. That's the real reason XJTU
can not release this right before historic issue being settled.

I hope the board master can save my discussion along with sandford's
writing in 'valued article board' for future reference or writing.

thank you

--
※ 来源:.The unknown SPACE bbs.mit.edu.[FROM: 155.69.23.127]

[上篇] [下篇]
[转寄] [转贴] [回信给作者] [修改文章] [删除文章] [同主题阅读] [从此处展开] [返回版面] [快速返回] [收藏] [举报]
 
回复文章
标题:
内 容:

未名交友
将您的链接放在这儿

友情链接


 

Site Map - Contact Us - Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy

版权所有,未名空间(mitbbs.com),since 1996