当前在线人数7718
首页 - 分类讨论区 - 体育健身 - 舞刀弄枪版 - 同主题阅读文章

此篇文章共收到打赏
0

  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
您目前伪币余额:0
未名交友
[更多]
[更多]
联邦第九巡回法院刚刚判决,室外公开携枪受宪法保护
[版面:舞刀弄枪][首篇作者:doublepar] , 2018年07月24日15:37:06 ,510次阅读,2次回复
来APP回复,赚取更多伪币 关注本站公众号:
[分页:1 ]
doublepar
进入未名形象秀
我的博客
[回复] [回信给作者] [本篇全文] [本讨论区] [修改] [删除] [转寄] [转贴] [收藏] [举报] [ 1 ]

发信人: doublepar (shoot straight), 信区: GunsAndGears
标  题: 联邦第九巡回法院刚刚判决,室外公开携枪受宪法保护
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jul 24 15:37:06 2018, 美东)

夏威夷公开携枪外出也要携枪证,有一居民申请两次被拒绝,告州政府。今天九院(!)
三个法官 2:1 判决,至少公开携枪要受宪法第二修正案保护,夏威夷的枪证颁发标准
违宪。

https://tinyurl.com/y6w3mcnh

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/07/daniel-zimmerman/ninth-circuit-three-judge-panel-upholds-right-to-open-carry-firearms/

完整判决:
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/07/24/12-17808.pdf

支持夏威夷州政府一直上诉到联邦最高法院 ......


--
※ 修改:·doublepar 於 Jul 24 15:39:26 2018 修改本文·[FROM: 64.]
※ 来源:·WWW 未名空间站 网址:mitbbs.com 移动:在应用商店搜索未名空间·[FROM: 64.]

 
doublepar
进入未名形象秀
我的博客
[回复] [回信给作者] [本篇全文] [本讨论区] [修改] [删除] [转寄] [转贴] [收藏] [举报] [ 2 ]

发信人: doublepar (shoot straight), 信区: GunsAndGears
标  题: Re: 联邦第九巡回法院刚刚判决,室外公开携枪受宪法保护
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jul 24 15:43:33 2018, 美东)

The panel concluded that Hawaii’s limitation on the open carry of firearms
to those “engaged in the protection of life and property” violated the
core of the Second Amendment and was void under any level of scrutiny.

VOID UNDER ANY LEVEL OF SCRUTINY

这个判词 ...... 好给力!
--
※ 来源:·WWW 未名空间站 网址:mitbbs.com 移动:在应用商店搜索未名空间·[FROM: 64.]

 
abracadabra
进入未名形象秀
我的博客
[回复] [回信给作者] [本篇全文] [本讨论区] [修改] [删除] [转寄] [转贴] [收藏] [举报] [ 3 ]

发信人: abracadabra (abracadabra), 信区: GunsAndGears
标  题: Re: 联邦第九巡回法院刚刚判决,室外公开携枪受宪法保护
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Jul 29 21:38:05 2018, 美东)


i think they are trying to avoid the case going to the scotus.

as it stands now, this ruling only applies to 9th court jurisdiction. those
of us in NY are still under tyrannic government and unconstitutional laws.

if they upheld the HAWAII law, likelihood is good that it would end up at
the high court AFTER Kavanaugh's confirmation.

【 在 doublepar (shoot straight) 的大作中提到: 】
: The panel concluded that Hawaii’s limitation on the open carry of
firearms
: to those “engaged in the protection of life and property” violated the
: core of the Second Amendment and was void under any level of scrutiny.
: VOID UNDER ANY LEVEL OF SCRUTINY
: 这个判词 ...... 好给力!



--
※ 来源:·WWW 未名空间站 网址:mitbbs.com 移动:在应用商店搜索未名空间·[FROM: 108.]

[分页:1 ]
[快速返回] [ 进入舞刀弄枪讨论区] [返回顶部]
回复文章
标题:
内 容:

未名交友
将您的链接放在这儿

友情链接


 

Site Map - Contact Us - Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy

版权所有,未名空间(mitbbs.com),since 1996