Aren't we all.

【 在 haibugui (昵称太短！) 的大作中提到: 】
: 你们汉人说不为良乡，当为良医，机器人治病要去修理厂。
: 版上基本都是神经病了，小弟我看你骨骼清奇，还有治疗的必要。




提示: 本博文来自于 History 版

发信人: zhangjianshi (长见识), 信区: NBA
标 题: Re: 韦德为了几百万丢掉了忠诚！
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jul 19 20:22:43 2016, 美东)

最后一个饼

撑吐了

发信人: zhangjianshi (长见识), 信区: Basketball
标 题: Re: 籃球版老ID
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jul 19 20:07:19 2016, 美东)

某种意义上讲，就没多过吧，艾迪和好泊斯特。

[在 Dominique (曾经木木难为水 除却金色不是云) 的大作中提到：]
:果真是老id ：)
:老id或许还来，但是没精力发言了
:当然另一个原因是实在很少有帖子比较值得re的。。。

发信人: zhangjianshi (长见识), 信区: Basketball
标 题: Re: 金州之春 (拳打朱自清）
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jul 18 23:42:16 2016, 美东)

估么着多收了三五斗（某些失意于自由市场的队）搞一下也会挺有韵味，但估计要琵琶行（雷霆）才能超越这个。

最后，偶觉得楼主忽略了茅屋为秋风所破歌（唬人当下）是不对的。

This is just a random thought. According to the list

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States

the presidency selection has become very stable over the last 40 years or so. The logic behind seems to be quite sound.

Each party would get 2 rounds, a consistent chance of 8 years, unless someone screws up big time which provides the other side with a bonus round (basically, just Reagan+Bush I for 3 rounds with 1 taken from Carter).

This can be viewed as a sign of maturity of the whole system, and also indicates that none has done such a great job during the tenure for people's further favor. Also, there could also be the factor that wise politicians are making their plans accordingly to the rhythm, which is a practical strategy but actually not politically correct.

So far, it seems that D-side has taken their fate in this round quite willingly, and is even using this opportunity to settle some historical deals and cause a situation which might be helpful for the next chance to rise into power. The R-side has a more brutal flight within, longing for the triumph.


提示: 本博文来自于 USANews 版