发信人: zhangjianshi (长见识), 信区: Just_Basketball_Soccer
标 题: Re: 骑士进攻不行的原因
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jun 7 23:31:33 2016, 美东)

库里卖萌尿尿抖

克莱空有佛祖头

一朝得志舞熊丑

发信人: zhangjianshi (长见识), 信区: Basketball
标 题: Re: 其实我觉得今年FMVP还是萌库的
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jun 7 23:15:11 2016, 美东)

“还”亮着。

发信人: zhangjianshi (长见识), 信区: Just_Basketball_Soccer
标 题: Re: 骑士进攻不行的原因
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jun 7 11:12:30 2016, 美东)

这里偶就不太多过场了。

首战，一切正常，第三节焦灼，欧文和乐福都正常贡献。然后，德拉意外抓蛋，激怒对手，挑起了观众的
情绪。后面偶有事没跟，估计就是没调整过来。金庸本来就处于西决大逆转后的集体兴奋期，这个客场预
计就是难打的。

二战，一切正常，直到乐福被意外击倒。偶在版上一个叫巴恩斯肘击有无下文之类的帖子里表态了，现在
彻底黑金庸了。反正，勒布朗本来就有点对小个阵容的执念，TT四犯，乐福脑震荡缺阵，全队应该都有
点血气上头了，失去冷静，表现得有勇无谋，崩盘正常。

偶觉得，主场疯狂反扑是必然的，骑士众将应该是憋了一肚子火。金庸就是联盟为了湾区大市场而捧出来
的伪强队。

系列赛有的打，偶信心不减。而且金庸很可能会付出代价。乐福倒地后那几个所谓明星球员的表现是做人
的耻辱。


发信人: zhangjianshi (长见识), 信区: Just_Basketball_Soccer
标 题: Re: 骑士进攻不行的原因
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jun 7 14:24:48 2016, 美东)

至于攻防具体的方面。

骑士完全可以锁住水花，G1水花受限制的状况不是偶然，骑士对位这两个伪球星的人手非常充足。

骑士自己的进攻应该是完全没有问题，欧文和乐福（还能上的话）完全都可以打出来，没觉得金庸有任何
对位优势。

以前觉得最好是，勒布朗能够放下心里对小个阵容的执念，帮莫子找一下状态，妥妥的。

就是死保现有的小个阵容，其实机会也很好。偶现在还真有点希望能坚持这个。

金庸上下一直拿这个来挑衅，真想拿这样夯死这帮自以为了不起的兔崽子。上当就上当，有时候就TMD
要争口气。

看比赛的话，这个事并不少见的。

球员倒下的地方有可能影响比赛，裁判可以主动吹停的，好像有时候会最后把暂停记在倒地球员的球队一边。

这里是一些网上说法：

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070406181906AAVQlV6

里面直接相关的有：

An official stops the game for a disturbance in the game or a replay.....Its meant for situations in which team's timeouts shouldn't be wasted.

An officials timeout are for disturbance most like likely for serious injuries on players they call an officials timeout so the teams don't have to waste there timeouts Example Shaun Livingston broke his leg they called a timeout they took him out on a stretcher.

An official's timeout is a timeout called by the official in case of emergency, like technical problems, injuries, blood on the court, etc...

当然，这些并不是官方的。官方的规则解释是在：

http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_5.html?nav=ArticleList

里面说的并不白话，比较简单的看：

a. The timing devices shall be stopped whenever the official's whistle sounds indicating one of the following:
(1) A personal or technical foul.
(2) A jump ball.
(3) A floor violation.
(4) An unusual delay.
＊＊(5) A suspension-of-play for any other emergency (no substitutions are permitted.) ＊＊
(6) A regular or 20-second timeout.

【 在 solution (昵称去哪儿了) 的大作中提到: 】
: 同学你什么都不懂啊，NBA里面没有裁判因为球员受伤吹停比赛一说
: 场上人受伤了，都必须是队友立刻犯规来停球的
: 你不会真的只看文字转播吧


提示: 本博文来自于 Basketball 版

Just read the article and watched (part of) the video at

https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2016/06/04/it-ought-to-be-common-knowledge-that-donald-
trump-is-not-fit-for-the-presidency-of-the-united-states-of-america/

Tao was very careful in considering that statement as a "proposition" (or claim, not a theorem),
and made it clear that there was no mathematical attempt in proving it. It's considered by
himself as mutual knowledge, as illustrated by his examples.

The main focus of the article is to point out the difference between "mutual" and "common"
knowledge, as illustrated by Christian Andersens’ fable of the Emperor’s New Clothes.

His point, in my eyes, is to encourage people (agreeing on Proposition 1) to speak up instead of
waiting for the case to develop in any unfavourable way, which might come from the sense of
urgency of someone quite sensitive regarding the tendency of the whole society.

The outcome might not be what he would expect, which was not ruled out in the article itself.

As for Hillary's CNN video, it's not a very compelling speech, and as common knowledge, it's
aways easier to only attack than build while attacking.

提示: 本博文来自于 USANews 版